Still, we got what we went for:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d07f/8d07f2221fd36b13db10f67aec6936310903310a" alt=""
It's the Celestron Firstscope 114 - a 4.5 inch reflector - and it's Spud's first telescope.
[D]espite its all-too-frequently displayed anti-American, anti-Bush agenda, BBC News remains in large part a news organisation. And however flagrant its unabashed editorial slant, the Guardian is still, for the time being at least, a newspaper - if only barely.Read it all.
The Independent, however, is neither.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has courted further controversy by explicitly calling the Nazi Holocaust of European Jewry a "myth". "They have created a myth today that they call the massacre of Jews and they consider it a principle above God, religions and the prophets," he said.I expect a number of European commentators will rush to "contextualize" Ahmadinejad's remarks, explaining to us simple folk why we shouldn't be alarmed - though, somewhat surprisingly, Jonathan Freedland in the Guardian says he's not going to play that game anymore.
On live TV, he called for Europe or North America - even Alaska - to host a Jewish state, not the Middle East.
[E]veryone has their limits and last week I reached mine. On Thursday the president of Iran chose to stand with the cranks, neo-fascists and racists who deny the factual truth of the Holocaust.
"Some European countries insist on saying that Hitler killed millions of innocent Jews in furnaces," said Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. "Although we don't accept this claim..."
Suddenly, the usual apologetics won't work. No one can say Iran's president was really complaining about Israel or Zionism, rather than Jews. No one can say he was talking about the west's colonial crimes. He was peddling, instead, one of the defining tropes of the racist hard right: Holocaust denial. It is a stance that seeks to deny Jews their history, their suffering, almost their very being. Like denying that African-Americans were ever slaves, it is a move made by those who wish only harm.
Fyodor Dostoevsky once said that the degree of civilisation in a society can be judged by entering its prisons. The observation can be extended to crime and punishment as well.Indeed.
That being the case, the punishment meted out to P V Naushad, a working-class Indian expatriate, by a shariat court in Saudi Arabia is a blot on the system of justice in that country.
The court has ordered that one of Naushad's eyes be gouged out as punishment for injuring the eye of an Arab in a scuffle. An eye for an eye is not just barbaric, but a perversion of justice.
[...]
The quest for a more humane definition of justice should not be debated as a clash of civilisations. It is just another, but an important and necessary, step towards the creation of a world that values mercy more than revenge.
"Church of England evil, say archbishops"What, really, really evil? Who'd have thunk it!
The burka isn't about modesty or religious expression, it's about obliteration of the self; a complete eradication of individuality. It is about making yourself a non-being. I will say it now, I still feel sick when I see a woman in a burka, not because I am racist, not because I have anything against Islam, but because any abuse of the self shocks and upsets me.Me too.