November 20, 2003

Funding hate

The JTA reports:
In a stunning reversal, the Ford Foundation has admitted it erred in funding anti-Israeli Palestinian groups and has vowed to establish tough new guidelines to stop its funds from being used for anti-Semitic activities anywhere in the world.
Sounds like an obviously good idea to me, but the Foundation seemed to need a bit of prompting to make the change. An in-depth investigation by the JTA and Congressional pressure finally did the trick.

Thanks to Mobius at Jew School for the link.

Woman's work

Ever had a prosecuting attorney cook you breakfast?

After I've dropped the boys off at school, I sometimes have breakfast at a local Ma-and-Pa’s. Turns out, ‘Ma’ is a senior prosecutor with the Crown Prosecution Service.

Cooks a good breakfast too.

Salam TV

Salam Pax, the original Baghdad blogger, and now one of the Guardian’s media darlings, has done a video report for the BBC’s Newsnight.

Be honest, did anyone really see this man’s potential in his first post from Baghdad.

November 19, 2003

Favorite five

I haven't had a lot of time to blog over the past few days. Things are a bit up in the air here at the moment and we're in the middle of a family rethink. More on that later.

In the meantime, here are five articles I came across today that I don't have time to comment on.

Oliver Kamm on George Bush and foreign policy.

Media Research Center on silencing the silent majority in Britain.

Michael J Totten on why Iraq is not Vietnam.

David Aaronovitch on why Michael Moore isn’t funny.

The Weekly Standard has more on the Saddam/Osama connection.

Normal service will resume shortly.

Selection bias

The BBC’s Jeremy Paxman is very good at asking questions but it seems he’s not so good at answering them. This one, from David Frum, left him flummoxed.
How can you do a program that purports to study why British people are so hostile to President Bush – without taking note of the state broadcaster’s role in creating and magnifying that hostility?
Anyone got an answer to that?

Thanks to Biased BBC for the link.

Mind your manners

Simon Jenkins, writing in today’s Times, reminds his fellows that their country once had a reputation for good manners.
Let us pull ourselves together and hear it for good manners. Courtesy is the cement of democracy, the discipline of open debate. It enables strong government to remain at peace with dissent. A state visit is supposedly a marriage of pageantry and good manners. Let us keep it that way.
Jenkins goes on to trace the roots and meaning of the ‘special relationship’ and he celebrates the ties that bind our two nations. At the same time, he criticizes the Bush visit and makes clear his opposition to US action in Iraq. I don’t share his views but I think it’s admirable that he’s able to express them in such a civilized fashion.

Unlike Harold Pinter, whose loutish senility is evident in this personal message to the president, published in yesterday's Guardian.
Dear President Bush,

I'm sure you'll be having a nice little tea party with your fellow war criminal, Tony Blair. Please wash the cucumber sandwiches down with a glass of blood, with my compliments.
Charming.

November 18, 2003

Human v machine

For the past week, former world chess champion Garry Kasparov has been involved in a four game match against X3D Fritz for the title of Man-Machine World Champion. After three games the scores are level. The deciding game takes place today in New York.

Fritz’s ‘parent’ company, X3D Technologies, has been providing on-line coverage of the match with an excellent website offering live commentary and in-depth analysis.

Kasparov’s victory with the white pieces in the third game is a textbook example of how to beat a computer at chess. The postgame analysis reveals not only the extent of Kasparov’s preparation for the match but also the limitations of computer ‘thinking’.

This useless-looking move [by Kasparov] confused most of the commentators, but to anyone with extensive anti-computer chess experience it makes perfect sense. The rook protects the f2 pawn, a potential weak spot, but why would you protect something that isn't being attacked?

The reason goes into how computers think. Its brute force calculation can only go so deep, even with four super-fast processors. Black's only possible source of counterplay in this position is to push its f-pawn and open up an attack against the area around the white king, f2 in particular.

If X3D Fritz's search, usually running 12-20 half-moves deep, ever reaches a position in which it sees success in such an attack it will put such a plan in motion. On the other hand, if it cannot reach a favorable position in its searches it will never play the initial moves required. With the rook on b2 protecting f2 already, the potential weakness of that critical square is somewhat hidden from the computer's search.

X3D Fritz can't just play it anyway like a human would, knowing that everything else is useless. A machine has to receive a positive evaluation from its search to play a move and always plays the move that gives it the best evaluation. Since X3D Fritz sees no danger here for itself it is content to play moves that do nothing, but don't cause any negative effect either. It twiddles its virtual reality thumbs. Any human would say, "I have to do SOMETHING."

November 17, 2003

Dissenting rabble

On the eve of George Bush’s state visit to Britain, Brendan O’Neill takes a close look at the UK’s anti-war campaigners.
The anti-war movement has coincided with a high level of public disengagement from politics. The marches against invading Iraq - including the million-strong demo in Hyde Park in February 2003 - were not the new radical moment in British politics that many claimed. Rather, the anti-war movement has been more like a collection of individuals expressing their frustration with politics and politicians.
A traditional English mob. How quaint.

Fisk the evangelist

David Pryce-Jones in the Spectator writing about the Independent's Robert Fisk:

What makes Fisk conspicuous is his self-righteousness. The content and style of his writing proclaim that in his own eyes he is not really a reporter but the repository of truth. Other journalists are not up to their task; they are ‘nasty little puffed-up fantasy colonels’, warmongering collaborators of the wicked American–Israelis. He alone has the calling and the courage to reveal the evil rampant everywhere. Woe, woe, saith the preacher. Fisking is evangelical missionary work.
It’s full of well-deserved criticism.

But where did Pryce-Jones get his definition of fisking? He has it as ‘meaning the selection of evidence solely in order to bolster preconceptions and prejudices’, and says he got it in the ‘www arena’. But that’s not the way I've seen the word used in the blogworld.

Is PJ just getting himself confused here, or is there really another definition of 'fisking' out there?

Navel gazing

The Guardian asks: "Did Adam and Eve have navels?"

The Sac is back

Kelley at Suburban Blight has a new Cul-de-Sac post.

Last time out, Kelley changed the Sac’s format, reducing the number of featured blogs and focusing in more depth on each one. I like the revised format; it's more like a guided tour than a straight linkfest.

I'm a big Sac fan. I don't have the time to explore much of the Blogosphere myself, so it's an important source of new reads for me.

Like Kelley says:
If you're reading blogs today and want a jumping-off point, this is the place to start. Mesdames et messieurs - le Cul-De-Sac!
Start clicking!

November 16, 2003

Crystal nights

Via Alice Bachini: A post from The Dissident Frogman on “The Rise of Nazism”.
To me, the rise of Nazism will always evoke gatherings of Socialists and Nationalists, putting aside their differences to unite the forces of their hates of individual liberties at large and the global ambiance of a dark sun rising over a murky dawn: no clearly defined threat - not yet - but a sheaf of gloomy harbingers that makes you wonder what the day will bring.

The rise of Nazism, as seen when it happened, was probably nothing more than uproarious crowds assembling and revolving around negative concepts, and cheering at the harangues of populist speakers. A bit theatrical, a bit violent but so many people found their deceptive ideas so appealing, that the visible violence was probably disregarded or minimized.
Go read the whole thing.

Ghost ships ahoy

Yesterday, the BBC reported on the continuing controversy over the disused American cargo ships from the James River Fleet which are bound for the British port of Hartlepool.
Friends of the Earth says the decision to allow more ships due to be scrapped to dock in the UK is creating an environmental threat. Two US vessels have already arrived, and now permission has been given for two more to stay in the UK.
Peter Mandelson, MP for Hartlepool where the ships are destined to be broken up, says the fears are based on "misinformation". Campaigners believe toxic chemicals and asbestos on the US ships pose a risk.
Environmental campaigners seem capable of believing pretty much anything, as long as it doesn't come from a government source.

Philip Stott provided a rational view of the issue in a Thursday post at Envirospin Watch.
The truth is that some environmentalists (remember there are many shades of green) are not living in the real world and they are starting to be a serious threat to the UK economy. I wonder how much of the protest about these particular ships is because they are (Heaven forbid!) American and were once used to service the American navy? Our rationality about America has now gone out to march with the barmy brigade.
And, while you’re over at Philip’s place, you might also want to check out his Greenspeak-English dictionary. It’s a hoot!

November 15, 2003

Home thoughts

Yesterday, Andrew Sullivan’s Daily Dish included an email from an American living in England.
It's really bad here. […] After 22 years in Surrey we're looking to move to America.
I hate to admit it, but Mac and I are thinking of doing the same.

Saturday roundup

BBC: Britain on heightened terror alert for Bush visit.

MSNBC: Judge revokes Moussaoui’s right to self-representation.

CNN: India & China in joint naval exercise.

CBS News: Commandments judge expelled.

BBC: Murdoch papers may back Tories in next election.

Fox News: Illegal workers sue Wal-Mart for hiring them.

ABC News: High school girls suspended for kissing.

Sky News: MJ’s father denies beating/admits whipping.

Entertainment: Russell Crowe acclaimed for 'Master & Commander'.

November 14, 2003

Spinning Bush

British Spin anticipates George Bush’s forthcoming state visit to the UK with a very British take on the man and his motives.

It’s a revealing post that also offers an insight into the British concept of “fair play”.
A clarification here, the vaunted sense of British fair play means fair play just for the British. When ruling the world, we were entirely justified in sending gun ships up Chinese rivers to support the opium trade and would have very miffed if some Yankee upstart had been going around shouting “no blood for dope” at Disraeli. Burger-scoffing surrender baboons in the war against yellowism, John Bull would have said. Jingoism? We invented it.
The British might have invented jingoism, but they forgot to patent it.

November 13, 2003

Russian fiction

They’re running the Margie Schoedinger story, again.

Chicken soup

Roger Simon, in an evocatively titled post, comments on cartoonist Tom Tomorrow’s recent depiction of warbloggers as chickenhawks, which implied they should either sign-up or shut-up. It's a hot topic; the wideranging discussion that follows Roger’s post involves over a hundred comments.

Citizen (formerly Lieutenant) Smash also took issue with Tomorrow in an exchange of e-mails he published Tuesday. Today, Smash comments on the “rhetorical firestorm” that ensued.

Mr Yesterday provides a cartoonist's response to Tomorrow's views.

Elsewhere, Dean Esmay talks about what it means to be a warblogger and why he thinks it’s important.

And, on a related issue, Rob Lyman, guesting at Winds of Change, wrote yesterday on the moral duty that Americans owe their country. I don’t like the sound of “Tribal Patriotism”, and I reason from different premises, but I agree that an American's first duty is to their fellow citizens.

It’s a thought provoking piece and Armed Liberal follows up the discussion with a strong post on patriotism and liberal values.

November 12, 2003

Anatomy for dummies

Max Hastings has either blown a gasket or he doesn’t know as many Americans as I thought. How else do you explain this line from his recent Spectator article on the ‘quagmire’ in Iraq?
I have yet to meet an American who regards Iraq as anything other than ‘the asshole of the universe’.
I was so animated by Hastings’ remark that I called a few people and asked them what they thought. As a result, I can say that most Americans I’ve spoken to don’t think Iraq is ‘the asshole of the universe’.

We’re all pretty much agreed; that honor belongs to France.

Kilts in a twist

The BBC reports on the European Union’s difficulties over its classification of kilts.

Statisticians at the EU recently asked the Scots to start collecting data on the number of kilts they sold. There was just one problem:
The questionnaires, sent to Scottish firms by EU statistical agency Eurostat, did not allow kiltmakers to register the national dress as men's clothing.

Instead, they were told to fill in how many kilts they had sold in the space provided for women's skirts.
Priceless.